“…If the planes didn’t cause them to crash, maybe it was the associated fires. It turns out that the highest temperature that can be produced by a jet fuel fire is about 1,800*F, but the melting point of steel is around 2,800*F. So that makes the temperature about 1,000*F short of causing them to melt. If they didn’t melt, maybe they weakened enough to collapse? But UL certified the steel in the buildings to 2,000*F for at least six hours before they would even significantly weaken. One building fell after only an hour, the other after little more than an hour and a half. So how was that possible?…”
Big Lies: From JFK to 9/11
The Carp (Spring 2006)
By Jim Fetzer
As posted at Scholars for Truth
Michael Baden, M.D., who chaired the medical panel for the House Select Committee during its reinvestigation of the death of JFK from 1977-78 recently observed that, if the “magic bullet” theory were false, then there would have to have been at least six shots from at least three different directions. We have proven that the “magic bullet” theory is not only false but is anatomically impossible. (Visit “The ‘Lone-Nutter’Refutation” on my web site at http://www.assassinationscience.com.)
We have also proven that Jack was hit at least four times, John Connally at least once, with one miss. Jack was hit from the front and from the back, Connally was hit from the side, and the miss that injured James Tague was fired from behind. So we have independently proven that there were at least six shots from three different direcitons. (The best sources is Murder in Dealey Plaza, with contributions from nine experts.)
We have even proven that, as long as JFK was an vertebrate, he had a backbone that included cervical vertebrae, some of which made it physically impossible for any shot to have entered at the official location and exited at the official location. Which only goes to show how far the goverment is willing to go to mislead and deceive us. It is not even physically possible!
Amazing as it may seem, the official account of 9/11 trades upon another set of physical impossibilities. The Twin Towers were constructed to withstand the impact of the largest available airplanes, which were Boeing 707s, very similar to the planes that hit the building. The project manager said that, because of the sophisticated load-redistribution capabilities, their impact on the towers would be like “sticking a pencil through mosquito netting”.
If the planes didn’t cause them to crash, maybe it was the associated fires. It turns out that the highest temperature that can be produced by a jet fuel fire is about 1,800*F, but the melting point of steel is around 2,800*F. So that makes the temperature about 1,000*F short of causing them to melt. If they didn’t melt, maybe they weakened enough to collapse? But UL certified the steel in the buildings to 2,000*F for at least six hours before they would even significantly weaken. One building fell after only an hour, the other after little more than an hour and a half. So how was that possible?
The buildings also fell in about 10 seconds apiece, which is the same rate of fall as a grand piano would have taken if it had been released from their top at the same time they started to fall. That is only possible if there was no resistance from floor to floor. Something had to take out the lower floors BEFORE the upper floors impacted with them. Actually the floors appear to have been completely blown apart from scratch.
Most buildings only create a massive cloud of dust and debris when they hit the ground. These buildings have massive clouds of dust and debris from the very beginning–starting at the top! So how do buildings that are 110 stories tall explode from the top down? There had to have been a massive force that caused the concrete to turninto very fine dust and that blew steel support columns outward and evenupward.
Our best guess is that it was a very sophisticated form of thermate, which may have been enhanced with nano-technology. That could also account for pools of molten metal found in the subbasements three, four, and five weeks later. A 47-story building, known as WTC7, fell later that afternoon after Larry Silverstein, who had leased the World Trade Center, suggested to fire officials that perhaps they should “pull it”. They pulled it, which means they brought it down using controlled demolitions. That would have been possible only if explosives had been prepositioned in the building. If they were in WTC7, why not in WTC1 and WTC2 as well?
And it gets worse. What I am telling you is that the government, once again, has been lying to our face about one of the great tragedies of our time. If you want supporting evidence from experts and scholars who are studying this case, visit st911.org on line and check us out. But if you want to believe in your government, don’t bother! The bottom line is chilling.
Jim Fetzer founded and co-chairs Scholars for 9/11 Truth